FBL vs PAAU

FBL vs PAAU

Which is better, FBL or PAAU?

FBL costs less.

FBL has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: FBL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBLPAAU
Expense Ratio1.09%Best1.50%
AUM$193M$633,626.99
Dividend Yield3.30%0.00%
Holdings43
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesREX Shares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionDec 13, 2022Mar 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 91 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FBL has data through Oct 9, 2026 and PAAU through Jul 10, 2026.

Compare FBL against instead:FBL vs SPYFBL vs QQQFBL vs VOOFBL vs VTIPAAU against:PAAU vs VXUS

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBL charges 1.09% per year while PAAU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $150 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBL currently yields 3.30% against 0.00% for PAAU.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FBL and PAAU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FBLPAAU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBL or PAAU?

FBL has an expense ratio of 1.09% while PAAU charges 1.50%. FBL is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBL or PAAU?

FBL yields 3.30% while PAAU yields 0.00%, so FBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PAAU better than FBL?

FBL has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.