FDCF vs VXUS
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDCF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $97M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.49% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.16% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.62% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FDCF vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDCF returned +11.16% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FDCF is up 6.49% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, FDCF compounded at +26.62% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDCF has the edge at +25.26% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDCF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for FDCF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDCF charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDCF currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FDCF and VXUS share 4 holdings out of 7904 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDCF or VXUS?
FDCF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDCF or VXUS?
Over the past year FDCF returned +11.16% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDCF annualized +25.26% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDCF or VXUS?
FDCF has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FDCF -22.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FDCF and VXUS?
FDCF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDCF and VXUS?
FDCF and VXUS share 4 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7904 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDCF or VXUS?
FDCF yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.