FDCF vs VOO
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDCF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.49% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.16% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.62% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FDCF vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDCF returned +11.16% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FDCF is up 6.49% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FDCF compounded at +26.62% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDCF has the edge at +25.26% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDCF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for FDCF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDCF charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDCF currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FDCF and VOO share 17 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDCF or VOO?
Over the past year FDCF returned +11.16% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDCF annualized +25.26% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FDCF -22.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FDCF and VOO?
FDCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDCF and VOO?
FDCF and VOO share 17 common holdings with a 19.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.