FDCF vs VOO
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FDCF or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FDCF led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDCF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $97M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 43 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.33% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.11% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.57%Best | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $20,669Best | $18,595 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.0% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.3 years).
FDCF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
FDCF vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDCF returned +5.11% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, FDCF is up 7.33% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, FDCF compounded at +28.57% per year against +22.72% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDCF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for FDCF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDCF charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDCF currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
49.8% of FDCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.0% of VOO's money is in holdings FDCF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in FDCF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 43 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 471 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FDCF (68.1% of the fund), and 16 for FDCF that do not appear in VOO (28.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDCF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.98% | 7.55% | 1.57% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 7.88% | 3.24% | 4.64% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.71% | 7.05% | 4.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.12% | 4.13% | 0.99% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.82% | 1.90% | 3.92% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 6.53% | 0.29% | 6.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.21% | 5.36% | 4.15% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 2.67% | 0.12% | 2.55% |
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 2.54% | 0.10% | 2.44% |
| LYVLive Nation Entertainment Inc | 2.05% | 0.04% | 2.01% |
49.8% of FDCF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDCF or VOO?
Over the past year FDCF returned +5.11% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FDCF -22.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FDCF and VOO?
FDCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDCF and VOO?
49.8% of FDCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.0% of VOO's is in holdings FDCF also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in FDCF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDCF or VOO?
FDCF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FDCF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FDCF led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.