FDCF vs IVV
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDCF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +6.59% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.20% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.77% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
FDCF vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDCF returned +11.20% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, FDCF is up 6.59% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, FDCF compounded at +25.77% per year against +21.80% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDCF has the edge at +25.32% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDCF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for FDCF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDCF charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDCF currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FDCF and IVV share 17 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDCF or IVV?
FDCF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDCF or IVV?
Over the past year FDCF returned +11.20% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDCF annualized +25.32% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDCF or IVV?
FDCF has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FDCF -22.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FDCF and IVV?
FDCF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDCF and IVV?
FDCF and IVV share 17 common holdings with a 19.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDCF or IVV?
FDCF yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.