FDCF vs QQQ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDCF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $97M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +4.17% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.94% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.41% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FDCF vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FDCF returned +9.94% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, FDCF is up 4.17% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, FDCF compounded at +26.41% per year against +26.08% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDCF has the edge at +24.27% annualized vs +13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.4% for FDCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for FDCF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDCF charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDCF currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FDCF and QQQ share 15 holdings out of 126 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDCF or QQQ?
FDCF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDCF or QQQ?
Over the past year FDCF returned +9.94% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDCF annualized +24.27% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDCF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.4% for FDCF. Worst drawdown: FDCF -22.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FDCF and QQQ?
FDCF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDCF and QQQ?
FDCF and QQQ share 15 common holdings with a 23.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 126 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDCF or QQQ?
FDCF yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.