FDFF vs VXUS
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDFF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $44M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.14% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.99% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FDFF vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FDFF is up 5.37% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, FDFF compounded at +13.99% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDFF has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDFF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for FDFF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDFF charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDFF currently yields 0.98% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FDFF and VXUS share 7 holdings out of 7909 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDFF or VXUS?
FDFF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDFF or VXUS?
Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDFF annualized +14.28% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDFF or VXUS?
FDFF has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FDFF -23.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FDFF and VXUS?
FDFF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDFF and VXUS?
FDFF and VXUS share 7 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7909 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDFF or VXUS?
FDFF yields 0.98% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.