FDFF vs VYM
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDFF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $44M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.14% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.99% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FDFF vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, FDFF is up 5.37% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, FDFF compounded at +13.99% per year against +19.03% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDFF has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDFF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for FDFF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDFF charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDFF currently yields 0.98% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FDFF and VYM share 8 holdings out of 642 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDFF or VYM?
FDFF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDFF or VYM?
Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDFF annualized +14.28% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDFF or VYM?
FDFF has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FDFF -23.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FDFF and VYM?
FDFF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDFF and VYM?
FDFF and VYM share 8 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 642 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDFF or VYM?
FDFF yields 0.98% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.