FDFF vs QQQ
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDFF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $44M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.14% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.99% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FDFF vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, FDFF is up 5.37% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, FDFF compounded at +13.99% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDFF has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.5% for FDFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for FDFF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDFF charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDFF currently yields 0.98% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDFF or QQQ?
FDFF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDFF or QQQ?
Over the past year FDFF returned +0.14% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDFF annualized +14.28% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDFF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.5% for FDFF. Worst drawdown: FDFF -23.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FDFF and QQQ?
FDFF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDFF and QQQ?
FDFF and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 147 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDFF or QQQ?
FDFF yields 0.98% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FDFF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.