FDMO vs VTI
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FDMO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FDMO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDMO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $904M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 140 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.18%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +18.02% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.42%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54%Best | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.2%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,715Best | $17,734 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2016 to Sep 25, 2026 (10 years).
FDMO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
FDMO vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDMO returned +18.02% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, FDMO is up 14.18% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, FDMO compounded at +28.42% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FDMO has the edge at +14.83% annualized vs +14.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.2% for FDMO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDMO charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDMO currently yields 0.61% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.8% of FDMO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.1% of VTI's money is in holdings FDMO also owns.
Most of FDMO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
128 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in FDMO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 140 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,023 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FDMO (50.4% of the fund), and 2 for FDMO that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDMO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.70% | 6.40% | 2.30% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.80% | 6.29% | 1.51% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.41% | 2.90% | 2.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.62% | 3.65% | 0.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.71% | 1.29% | 1.42% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.08% | 1.08% | 1.00% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.74% | 1.35% | 0.39% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.75% | 1.31% | 0.44% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.70% | 1.28% | 0.42% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.58% | 1.22% | 0.36% |
98.8% of FDMO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDMO or VTI?
FDMO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDMO or VTI?
Over the past year FDMO returned +18.02% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FDMO annualized +14.83% vs +14.02% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDMO or VTI?
FDMO has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FDMO -34.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FDMO and VTI?
FDMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDMO and VTI?
98.8% of FDMO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.1% of VTI's is in holdings FDMO also owns. They hold 128 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in FDMO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDMO or VTI?
FDMO yields 0.61% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FDMO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FDMO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.