FDND vs IVV
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FDND or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDND | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.64% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.09% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.82% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $12,981 | $15,122Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.7% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.5 years).
FDND vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
FDND vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDND returned -3.82% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, FDND is up 4.09% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 12.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for FDND and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDND charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDND currently yields 7.64% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
82.5% of FDND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.0% of IVV's money is in holdings FDND also owns.
Most of FDND is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FDND and 505 in IVV, against full books of 86 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 471 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FDND (84.4% of the fund), and 15 for FDND that do not appear in IVV (15.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDND | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.82% | 4.01% | 5.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 9.02% | 1.94% | 7.08% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 7.26% | 0.72% | 6.54% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 4.76% | 3.19% | 1.57% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.79% | 2.56% | 1.23% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc. | 6.10% | 0.24% | 5.86% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 5.22% | 0.31% | 4.91% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 5.02% | 0.24% | 4.78% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 4.22% | 0.37% | 3.85% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.00% | 0.47% | 3.53% |
82.5% of FDND is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDND or IVV?
FDND has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDND or IVV?
Over the past year FDND returned -3.82% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDND or IVV?
FDND has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 12.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FDND -24.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FDND and IVV?
FDND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDND and IVV?
82.5% of FDND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.0% of IVV's is in holdings FDND also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FDND and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDND or IVV?
FDND yields 7.64% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FDND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FDND?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.