FFOG vs VYM
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FFOG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $344M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 47 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.99% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 10.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,836Best | $16,711 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs VYM Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.86% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 10.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $4 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
3.9% of FFOG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
VYM and FFOG share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 47 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FFOG (89.7% of the fund), and 32 for FFOG that do not appear in VYM (80.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.86% | 7.35% | 3.49% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFOG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or VYM?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or VYM?
Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or VYM?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 10.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both FFOG and VYM?
FFOG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and VYM?
7.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 7.3% of VYM's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or VYM?
FFOG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FFOG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.