FFOG vs VTI
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $328M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.99% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.89% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
FFOG vs VTI Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, FFOG is up 6.99% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FFOG and VTI share 33 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 35.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOG or VTI?
Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFOG annualized +27.00% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FFOG and VTI?
FFOG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and VTI?
FFOG and VTI share 33 common holdings with a 35.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.