FFOG vs VTI
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FFOG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $344M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.99% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,836Best | $18,180 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs VTI Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.86% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
82.7% of FFOG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 35.9% of VTI's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
31 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 47 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,120 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FFOG (61.6% of the fund), and 3 for FFOG that do not appear in VTI (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.17% | 6.40% | 3.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.40% | 3.65% | 5.75% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.60% | 6.29% | 0.69% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.44% | 2.90% | 5.54% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.10% | 4.79% | 0.69% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.86% | 2.56% | 1.30% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.20% | 1.70% | 2.50% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.83% | 0.25% | 3.58% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.99% | 0.63% | 2.36% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.18% | 1.35% | 0.83% |
82.7% of FFOG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or VTI?
Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FFOG and VTI?
FFOG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and VTI?
82.7% of FFOG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 35.9% of VTI's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or VTI?
FFOG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FFOG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.