FFOG vs IVV
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFOG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $344M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 47 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.99% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,836Best | $18,292 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs IVV Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.86% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
72.6% of FFOG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.4% of IVV's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
23 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 490 in IVV, against full books of 47 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FFOG (58.2% of the fund), and 10 for FFOG that do not appear in IVV (11.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.17% | 8.07% | 2.10% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.40% | 3.84% | 5.56% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.60% | 7.02% | 1.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.44% | 3.00% | 5.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.10% | 5.69% | 1.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.86% | 2.65% | 1.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.20% | 1.90% | 2.30% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.83% | 0.35% | 3.48% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.99% | 0.72% | 2.27% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.18% | 1.38% | 0.80% |
72.6% of FFOG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or IVV?
Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FFOG and IVV?
FFOG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and IVV?
72.6% of FFOG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.4% of IVV's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FFOG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.