FFOG vs IVV
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $328M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +6.99% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.89% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FFOG vs IVV Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, FFOG is up 6.99% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FFOG and IVV share 25 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOG or IVV?
Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFOG annualized +27.00% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FFOG and IVV?
FFOG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and IVV?
FFOG and IVV share 25 common holdings with a 37.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or IVV?
FFOG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.