FFOG vs VOO
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFOG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $376M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 43 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +11.89% | +14.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.60% | +18.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.15%Best | +23.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $20,069Best | $18,434 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 12, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs VOO Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +9.60% while VOO returned +18.66%. Year to date, FFOG is up 11.89% versus a gain of 14.81% for VOO.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +27.15% per year against +23.30% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 11.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
72.0% of FFOG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 40.0% of VOO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
Most of FFOG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FFOG as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
23 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 43 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FFOG (59.1% of the fund), and 9 for FFOG that do not appear in VOO (12.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.88% | 7.55% | 2.33% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.13% | 4.13% | 5.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.77% | 7.05% | 1.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.26% | 3.24% | 5.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.94% | 5.36% | 1.42% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.67% | 1.90% | 2.77% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.71% | 2.86% | 0.85% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.92% | 0.28% | 3.64% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.39% | 1.21% | 1.18% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.84% | 0.72% | 2.12% |
72.0% of FFOG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or VOO?
Over the past year FFOG returned +9.60% vs +18.66% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 11.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FFOG and VOO?
FFOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and VOO?
72.0% of FFOG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 40.0% of VOO's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FFOG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.