FFOG vs VOO
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $328M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.99% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.89% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FFOG vs VOO Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, FFOG is up 6.99% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FFOG and VOO share 26 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOG or VOO?
Over the past year FFOG returned +8.89% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFOG annualized +27.00% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FFOG and VOO?
FFOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and VOO?
FFOG and VOO share 26 common holdings with a 38.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or VOO?
FFOG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.