FFOG vs QQQ
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $328M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +6.51% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.41% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FFOG vs QQQ Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +8.41% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, FFOG is up 6.51% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.4% for FFOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.55% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $18 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FFOG and QQQ share 23 holdings out of 122 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or QQQ?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOG or QQQ?
Over the past year FFOG returned +8.41% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FFOG annualized +26.77% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.4% for FFOG. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FFOG and QQQ?
FFOG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and QQQ?
FFOG and QQQ share 23 common holdings with a 45.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 122 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or QQQ?
FFOG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.