FFOG vs QQQ
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FFOG or QQQ?
Nearly the same fund. QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $344M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 47 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +8.86% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.99% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $19,836 | $20,014Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).
FFOG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs QQQ Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, FFOG is up 8.86% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $18 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
65.8% of FFOG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 49.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 47 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FFOG (49.4% of the fund), and 16 for FFOG that do not appear in QQQ (22.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.17% | 8.44% | 1.73% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.40% | 4.67% | 4.73% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.60% | 7.27% | 1.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.44% | 3.36% | 5.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.10% | 5.76% | 1.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.86% | 3.16% | 0.70% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.20% | 2.78% | 1.42% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.22% | 3.45% | 1.23% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.83% | 0.88% | 2.95% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.42% | 2.56% | 1.14% |
65.8% of FFOG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or QQQ?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or QQQ?
Over the past year FFOG returned +5.99% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or QQQ?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both FFOG and QQQ?
FFOG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and QQQ?
65.8% of FFOG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 49.6% of QQQ's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or QQQ?
FFOG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FFOG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.