FIFT vs OAKM
HCM Select 50 ETF vs Oakmark US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, FIFT or OAKM?
OAKM costs less.
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIFT | OAKM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.59%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| Holdings | 50 | 119 |
| YTD Price Return | - | +12.41% |
| 1Y Price Return | - | +19.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -15.2% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 34.7% |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Oakmark Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2026 | Dec 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Price Return (annualized), 5Y Price Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. FIFT yields 0.00% and OAKM 0.61% on top.
FIFT vs OAKM Performance
HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIFT charges 1.35% per year while OAKM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $59 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIFT currently yields 0.00% against 0.61% for OAKM.
Holdings Overlap
5.9% of FIFT's money is in holdings OAKM also owns. 7.0% of OAKM's money is in holdings FIFT also owns.
OAKM and FIFT share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 38 in OAKM, against full books of 50 and 119.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 38 positions we hold weights for.
OAKM holds 33 positions FIFT does not, 88.4% of the fund.
Largest: CRM 3.95%, KDP 3.71%, COP 3.51%, ABNB 3.50%, ICE 3.45%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FIFT and OAKM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIFT or OAKM?
FIFT has an expense ratio of 1.35% while OAKM charges 0.59%. OAKM is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FIFT and OAKM?
7.0% of OAKM's money is in holdings FIFT also owns. 7.0% of OAKM's is in holdings FIFT also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FIFT and 38 in OAKM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIFT or OAKM?
FIFT yields 0.00% while OAKM yields 0.61%, so OAKM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAKM better than FIFT?
OAKM has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.