FILL vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. FILL offers more diversification with 185 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.18% | |
| AUM | - | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | - | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | Mar 10, 1999 |
FILL vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 286 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FILL | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | 1.05% | 0.23% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or QQQ?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or QQQ?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FILL and QQQ?
FILL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and QQQ?
FILL and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 286 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.