FILL vs SCHD
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. FILL offers more diversification with 185 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.06% | |
| AUM | - | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +25.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +30.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +16.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +9.64% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | - | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | Oct 20, 2011 |
FILL vs SCHD Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while SCHD returned +30.41%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 25.69% for SCHD.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +16.03% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +9.64% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and SCHD share 7 holdings out of 278 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or SCHD?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +30.41% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or SCHD?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FILL and SCHD?
FILL and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and SCHD?
FILL and SCHD share 7 common holdings with a 10.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 278 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.