FILL vs IVV
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | - | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | May 15, 2000 |
FILL vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and IVV share 15 holdings out of 675 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or IVV?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or IVV?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FILL and IVV?
FILL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and IVV?
FILL and IVV share 15 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 675 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.