FILL vs VYM
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.04% | |
| AUM | - | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | - | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | Nov 10, 2006 |
FILL vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and VYM share 28 holdings out of 760 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or VYM?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or VYM?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FILL and VYM?
FILL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and VYM?
FILL and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 6.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 760 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.