FILL vs VXUS
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | - | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | Jan 26, 2011 |
FILL vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and VXUS share 29 holdings out of 8025 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or VXUS?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or VXUS?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FILL and VXUS?
FILL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and VXUS?
FILL and VXUS share 29 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8025 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.