FILL vs SPY
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.09% | |
| AUM | - | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +14.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +21.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +13.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | - | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | Jan 22, 1993 |
FILL vs SPY Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while SPY returned +21.71%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 14.24% for SPY.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +22.10% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +13.21% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.86% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and SPY share 14 holdings out of 675 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or SPY?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +21.71% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +8.86% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or SPY?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both FILL and SPY?
FILL and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and SPY?
FILL and SPY share 14 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 675 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.