FILL vs VTI
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FILL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 185 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.73% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.08% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.45% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | - | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | - | Equity | |
| Inception | - | May 24, 2001 |
FILL vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is a ETF from its sponsor and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, FILL is up 11.73% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, FILL compounded at +4.72% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +26.45% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FILL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for FILL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
FILL and VTI share 38 holdings out of 2934 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FILL or VTI?
Over the past year FILL returned +7.08% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FILL annualized +3.70% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FILL or VTI?
FILL has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FILL -76.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FILL and VTI?
FILL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FILL and VTI?
FILL and VTI share 38 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2934 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.