FITE vs QQQ
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FITE or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FITE led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. FITE is less concentrated, with 19.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FITE | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $146M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 79 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +26.77%Best | +17.95% |
| 1Y Return | +30.69%Best | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.20%Best | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.95%Best | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 20.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.2% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,878Best | $20,324 |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.5%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.7 years).
FITE vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
FITE vs QQQ Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FITE returned +30.69% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, FITE is up 26.77% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, FITE compounded at +32.20% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +16.95% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.58% annualized vs +16.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FITE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 20.1% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.2% for FITE and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FITE charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FITE currently yields 0.13% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
9.9% of FITE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 8.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings FITE also owns.
FITE and QQQ share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in FITE and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 79 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FITE (88.9% of the fund), and 67 for FITE that do not appear in QQQ (83.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FITE | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.28% | 3.16% | 1.88% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.20% | 2.10% | 0.90% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.87% | 1.30% | 0.57% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.84% | 0.94% | 0.90% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 1.59% | 0.53% | 1.06% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 1.34% | 0.41% | 0.93% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corp | 0.78% | 0.19% | 0.59% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FITE and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FITE or QQQ?
FITE has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FITE or QQQ?
Over the past year FITE returned +30.69% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so FITE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FITE annualized +16.23% vs +19.58% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FITE or QQQ?
FITE has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 20.1% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FITE -37.2% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both FITE and QQQ?
FITE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FITE and QQQ?
9.9% of FITE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 8.6% of QQQ's is in holdings FITE also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in FITE and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FITE or QQQ?
FITE yields 0.13% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FITE?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FITE led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. FITE is less concentrated, with 19.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.