FITZ vs VYM
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FITZ or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FITZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 32 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +1.15% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.12% |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.2% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | XFunds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FITZ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FITZ vs VYM Performance
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) is an ETF from XFunds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FITZ is up 1.15% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FITZ charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FITZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
34.1% of FITZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.2% of VYM's money is in holdings FITZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FITZ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 32 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 30 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 518 positions FITZ does not, 76.9% of the fund.
Largest: JNJ 2.51%, CSCO 1.86%, BAC 1.66%, UNH 1.52%, CAT 1.50%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FITZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.51% | 7.35% | 3.84% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 5.25% | 3.82% | 1.43% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.56% | 1.48% | 3.08% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.01% | 1.80% | 2.21% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.75% | 2.63% | 0.12% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.87% | 0.66% | 3.21% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 3.73% | 0.48% | 3.25% |
| WMWaste Mgmt | 3.05% | 0.34% | 2.71% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.37% | 0.25% | 2.12% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.00% | 1.37% | 0.37% |
34.1% of FITZ is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FITZ or VYM?
FITZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FITZ and VYM?
34.1% of FITZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.2% of VYM's is in holdings FITZ also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FITZ and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FITZ or VYM?
FITZ yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FITZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.