FITZ vs QQQ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FITZ or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FITZ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 32 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +0.78% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.2% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | XFunds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FITZ vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FITZ vs QQQ Performance
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) is an ETF from XFunds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, FITZ is up 0.78% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FITZ charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FITZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
54.6% of FITZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 51.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings FITZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FITZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 32 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 30 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 80 positions FITZ does not, 46.1% of the fund.
Largest: GOOGL 3.36%, META 2.78%, INTC 2.23%, CSCO 2.10%, AMAT 1.86%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FITZ | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.72% | 8.44% | 2.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.31% | 7.27% | 1.96% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.16% | 5.76% | 1.60% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 6.21% | 1.60% | 4.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.01% | 3.45% | 0.56% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.81% | 2.56% | 2.25% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.51% | 3.16% | 0.35% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.93% | 4.67% | 2.74% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 4.03% | 2.41% | 1.62% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.86% | 0.94% | 3.92% |
54.6% of FITZ is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FITZ or QQQ?
FITZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FITZ and QQQ?
54.6% of FITZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 51.5% of QQQ's is in holdings FITZ also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FITZ and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FITZ or QQQ?
FITZ yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FITZ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.