FLIN vs IVV
Franklin FTSE India ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLIN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 280 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.87% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.57% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.00% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.21% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
FLIN vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLIN returned -4.57% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, FLIN is down 7.87% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, FLIN compounded at +6.00% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.21% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for FLIN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLIN charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLIN currently yields 0.43% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FLIN and IVV share 1 holdings out of 775 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLIN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL | 0.52% | 0.04% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLIN or IVV?
FLIN has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLIN or IVV?
Over the past year FLIN returned -4.57% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLIN annualized +5.93% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLIN or IVV?
FLIN has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLIN -41.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FLIN and IVV?
FLIN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLIN and IVV?
FLIN and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 775 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLIN or IVV?
FLIN yields 0.43% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.