FLIN vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE India ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLIN offers more diversification with 284 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLIN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 284 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -8.56% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.51% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.04% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLIN vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLIN returned -7.51% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, FLIN is down 8.56% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLIN compounded at +5.57% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.04% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.7% for FLIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for FLIN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLIN charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLIN currently yields 0.43% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLIN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 373 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLIN or QQQ?
FLIN has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLIN or QQQ?
Over the past year FLIN returned -7.51% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLIN annualized +5.82% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLIN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.7% for FLIN. Worst drawdown: FLIN -41.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLIN and QQQ?
FLIN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLIN and QQQ?
FLIN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 373 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLIN or QQQ?
FLIN yields 0.43% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.