FLOW vs QQQ
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FLOW or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLOW led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. FLOW is less concentrated, with 23.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLOW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 102 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +21.77%Best | +17.21% |
| 1Y Return | +27.59%Best | +22.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.14% | +25.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $17,817 | $19,633Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.5%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.2 years).
FLOW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
FLOW vs QQQ Performance
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLOW returned +27.59% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, FLOW is up 21.77% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLOW compounded at +20.14% per year against +25.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.3% for FLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for FLOW and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLOW charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLOW currently yields 1.91% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of FLOW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings FLOW also owns.
FLOW and QQQ share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLOW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 102 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FLOW (95.1% of the fund), and 88 for FLOW that do not appear in QQQ (78.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLOW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.44% | 0.46% | 1.98% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 2.59% | 0.15% | 2.44% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.91% | 0.70% | 1.21% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.15% | 0.39% | 1.76% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.56% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc. | 1.85% | 0.23% | 1.62% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 1.88% | 0.13% | 1.75% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLOW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLOW or QQQ?
FLOW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLOW or QQQ?
Over the past year FLOW returned +27.59% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so FLOW leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLOW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.3% for FLOW. Worst drawdown: FLOW -21.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both FLOW and QQQ?
FLOW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLOW and QQQ?
14.8% of FLOW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.5% of QQQ's is in holdings FLOW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLOW and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLOW or QQQ?
FLOW yields 1.91% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FLOW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLOW led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. FLOW is less concentrated, with 23.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.