FLOW vs QQQ
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLOW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $30M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.10% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +20.02% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.98% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLOW vs QQQ Performance
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLOW returned +37.98% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, FLOW is up 20.02% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLOW compounded at +19.12% per year against +25.54% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, FLOW has the edge at +20.00% annualized vs +13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.8% for FLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for FLOW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLOW charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLOW currently yields 2.10% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLOW and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 183 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLOW or QQQ?
FLOW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLOW or QQQ?
Over the past year FLOW returned +37.98% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so FLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FLOW annualized +20.00% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLOW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.8% for FLOW. Worst drawdown: FLOW -21.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLOW and QQQ?
FLOW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLOW and QQQ?
FLOW and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 183 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLOW or QQQ?
FLOW yields 2.10% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.