FLOW vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: FLOWMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLOWVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.25%0.04%
AUM$30M$79.0B
Dividend Yield2.10%2.86%
Holdings102568
YTD Return+20.02%+15.80%
1Y Return+37.98%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.12%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)13.8%14.6%
Max Drawdown-21.6%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 10, 2023Nov 10, 2006

FLOW vs VYM Performance

Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLOW returned +37.98% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FLOW is up 20.02% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, FLOW compounded at +19.12% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, FLOW has the edge at +20.00% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.8% for FLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for FLOW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLOW charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLOW currently yields 2.10% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

1.7%overlap

FLOW and VYM share 33 holdings out of 609 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLOWWeight in VYMDifference
CMCSA2.66%0.49%2.17%
NTAP2.07%0.08%1.99%
CF1.86%0.07%1.79%
BBYProProPro
OCProProPro
APAProProPro
BWAProProPro
OVVProProPro
ADTProProPro
BBWIProProPro
See all 10 holdings FLOW shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLOW or VYM?

FLOW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FLOW or VYM?

Over the past year FLOW returned +37.98% vs +26.12% for VYM, so FLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FLOW annualized +20.00% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FLOW or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.8% for FLOW. Worst drawdown: FLOW -21.6% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both FLOW and VYM?

FLOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FLOW and VYM?

FLOW and VYM share 33 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 609 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLOW or VYM?

FLOW yields 2.10% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →