FLOW vs VOO
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FLOW or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLOW led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. FLOW is less concentrated, with 23.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLOW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +21.77%Best | +12.25% |
| 1Y Return | +27.59%Best | +17.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.14% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $17,817 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.5%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.2 years).
FLOW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
FLOW vs VOO Performance
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLOW returned +27.59% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, FLOW is up 21.77% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, FLOW compounded at +20.14% per year against +21.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for FLOW and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLOW charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLOW currently yields 1.91% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
55.8% of FLOW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.3% of VOO's money is in holdings FLOW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLOW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 102 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 454 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FLOW (96.9% of the fund), and 62 for FLOW that do not appear in VOO (37.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLOW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 2.84% | 0.23% | 2.61% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 2.59% | 0.05% | 2.54% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.44% | 0.16% | 2.28% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.15% | 0.14% | 2.01% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.06% | 0.21% | 1.85% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 2.21% | 0.04% | 2.17% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 2.11% | 0.05% | 2.06% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.91% | 0.23% | 1.68% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 2.08% | 0.05% | 2.03% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.96% | 0.16% | 1.80% |
55.8% of FLOW is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLOW or VOO?
Over the past year FLOW returned +27.59% vs +17.03% for VOO, so FLOW leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLOW -21.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FLOW and VOO?
FLOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLOW and VOO?
55.8% of FLOW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.3% of VOO's is in holdings FLOW also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in FLOW and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW yields 1.91% while VOO yields 1.04%, so FLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FLOW?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLOW led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. FLOW is less concentrated, with 23.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.