FLOW vs VOO
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLOW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +25.14% | +13.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.04% | +20.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.37% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLOW vs VOO Performance
Global X US Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLOW returned +33.04% while VOO returned +20.64%. Year to date, FLOW is up 25.14% versus a gain of 13.49% for VOO.
Over three years, FLOW compounded at +21.37% per year against +21.93% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, FLOW has the edge at +21.23% annualized vs +13.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for FLOW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLOW charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLOW currently yields 1.91% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLOW and VOO share 35 holdings out of 570 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLOW or VOO?
Over the past year FLOW returned +33.04% vs +20.64% for VOO, so FLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FLOW annualized +21.23% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLOW -21.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLOW and VOO?
FLOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLOW and VOO?
FLOW and VOO share 35 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 570 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLOW or VOO?
FLOW yields 1.91% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.