FMCX vs IVV
FM Focus Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMCX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $122M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.22% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.86% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.31% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Manhattan | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
FMCX vs IVV Performance
FM Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) is a ETF from First Manhattan and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMCX returned +9.86% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, FMCX is up 7.22% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, FMCX compounded at +15.31% per year against +22.17% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, FMCX has the edge at +10.09% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMCX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.5% for FMCX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMCX charges 0.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMCX currently yields 0.29% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FMCX and IVV share 27 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMCX or IVV?
FMCX has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMCX or IVV?
Over the past year FMCX returned +9.86% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FMCX annualized +10.09% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMCX or IVV?
FMCX has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FMCX -18.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FMCX and IVV?
FMCX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FMCX and IVV?
FMCX and IVV share 27 common holdings with a 23.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMCX or IVV?
FMCX yields 0.29% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.