FNDB vs VXUS
Schwab Fundamental US Broad Market ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNDB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNDB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,649 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.99% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.45% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.07% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FNDB vs VXUS Performance
Schwab Fundamental US Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNDB returned +32.45% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, FNDB is up 18.99% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, FNDB compounded at +20.07% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.36% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FNDB has the edge at +11.82% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNDB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for FNDB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNDB charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNDB currently yields 1.46% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FNDB and VXUS share 25 holdings out of 9463 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNDB or VXUS?
FNDB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNDB or VXUS?
Over the past year FNDB returned +32.45% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so FNDB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FNDB annualized +11.82% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNDB or VXUS?
FNDB has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FNDB -38.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FNDB and VXUS?
FNDB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNDB and VXUS?
FNDB and VXUS share 25 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 9463 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNDB or VXUS?
FNDB yields 1.46% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.