FNGU vs VTI
MicroSectors FANG+ 3x Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FNGU or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +5.10% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -19.42% | +12.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 81.0% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -18.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $10,460 | $12,633Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 20, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
FNGU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
FNGU vs VTI Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ 3x Leveraged ETN (FNGU) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGU returned -19.42% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, FNGU is up 5.10% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 81.0% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for FNGU and -18.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGU charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGU currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of FNGU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 32.1% of VTI's money is in holdings FNGU also owns.
Most of FNGU is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGU and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 10 and 3,464 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,119 positions FNGU does not, 64.8% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.18%, TSLA 1.36%, AMD 1.36%, LLY 1.34%, BRK.B 1.21%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 10.86% | 6.63% | 4.23% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.02% | 7.13% | 2.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 11.15% | 5.19% | 5.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 10.23% | 3.30% | 6.93% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 10.06% | 2.28% | 7.78% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 9.57% | 2.18% | 7.39% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 10.00% | 1.64% | 8.36% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 11.06% | 0.56% | 10.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.55% | 2.76% | 5.79% |
| NFLXNetflix Inc | 8.51% | 0.40% | 8.11% |
100.0% of FNGU is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGU or VTI?
FNGU has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGU or VTI?
Over the past year FNGU returned -19.42% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FNGU annualized +2.68% vs +14.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGU or VTI?
FNGU has been the more volatile fund at 81.0% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGU -60.8% vs VTI -18.9%.
Should I hold both FNGU and VTI?
FNGU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGU and VTI?
100.0% of FNGU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 32.1% of VTI's is in holdings FNGU also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGU and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGU or VTI?
FNGU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FNGU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.