GABF vs VOO
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GABF or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GABF led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GABF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.24% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.00% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 42 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +0.20% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.89% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.19% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $20,953Best | $20,434 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 10, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.3 years).
GABF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
GABF vs VOO Performance
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GABF returned -2.89% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, GABF is up 0.20% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, GABF compounded at +20.19% per year against +21.29% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, GABF has the edge at +18.77% annualized vs +18.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GABF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for GABF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GABF charges 1.24% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $124 vs $3 annually, a gap of $121 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GABF currently yields 2.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
65.0% of GABF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.7% of VOO's money is in holdings GABF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, GABF as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
24 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GABF and 504 in VOO, against full books of 42 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 470 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GABF (91.6% of the fund), and 18 for GABF that do not appear in VOO (34.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GABF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B | 5.59% | 1.42% | 4.17% |
| KKRKkr & Co., Inc., Series A, Pfd. | 4.77% | 0.10% | 4.67% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 3.60% | 1.26% | 2.34% |
| BXBlackstone, Inc. | 4.67% | 0.14% | 4.53% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.13% | 0.64% | 3.49% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 4.55% | 0.19% | 4.36% |
| SPGIS&p Global Inc. | 4.33% | 0.19% | 4.14% |
| V'visa Inc., Class 'a'' | 3.57% | 0.87% | 2.70% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co | 4.01% | 0.39% | 3.62% |
| MCOMoody'S Corp Common | 4.15% | 0.11% | 4.04% |
65.0% of GABF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GABF or VOO?
GABF has an expense ratio of 1.24% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $121 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GABF or VOO?
Over the past year GABF returned -2.89% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GABF annualized +18.77% vs +18.08% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GABF or VOO?
GABF has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GABF -20.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both GABF and VOO?
GABF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GABF and VOO?
65.0% of GABF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.7% of VOO's is in holdings GABF also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GABF and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GABF or VOO?
GABF yields 2.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GABF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GABF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GABF led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.