GAMR vs SCHD
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GAMR or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 48 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.62% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.06% | +30.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.98%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.94% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,008 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.2% | 41.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.5 years).
GAMR vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.5 years both funds cover.
GAMR vs SCHD Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GAMR returned +7.06% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, GAMR is up 7.62% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +19.98% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.94% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.83% annualized vs +11.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 14.9% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $6 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 21 holdings in GAMR and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 48 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GAMR (99.9% of the fund), and 11 for GAMR that do not appear in SCHD (59.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GAMR and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GAMR or SCHD?
Over the past year GAMR returned +7.06% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GAMR annualized +14.83% vs +11.82% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 14.9% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GAMR and SCHD?
GAMR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR yields 0.50% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GAMR?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.