GAMR vs SCHD
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $40M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +8.48% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.39% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.20% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.57% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GAMR vs SCHD Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GAMR returned +5.39% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, GAMR is up 8.48% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +20.20% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +3.57% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +15.01% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $6 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
GAMR and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 121 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GAMR or SCHD?
Over the past year GAMR returned +5.39% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GAMR annualized +15.01% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GAMR and SCHD?
GAMR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and SCHD?
GAMR and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or SCHD?
GAMR yields 0.50% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.