GAMR vs QQQ
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GAMR or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 48 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +7.01% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.15% | +24.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.30% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,204 | $19,586Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.6% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2016 to Sep 11, 2026 (10.5 years).
GAMR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.5 years both funds cover.
GAMR vs QQQ Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +2.74% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, GAMR is up 7.01% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +20.15% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.30% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.44% annualized vs +14.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.48% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
47.1% of GAMR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings GAMR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 48 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GAMR (75.9% of the fund), and 4 for GAMR that do not appear in QQQ (8.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAMR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 10.29% | 8.44% | 1.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 12.41% | 5.76% | 6.65% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 9.20% | 3.45% | 5.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 9.62% | 2.78% | 6.84% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 3.11% | 0.56% | 2.55% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.47% | 0.19% | 2.28% |
47.1% of GAMR is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or QQQ?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GAMR or QQQ?
Over the past year GAMR returned +2.74% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GAMR annualized +14.74% vs +20.44% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAMR or QQQ?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both GAMR and QQQ?
GAMR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and QQQ?
47.1% of GAMR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.2% of QQQ's is in holdings GAMR also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or QQQ?
GAMR yields 0.48% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GAMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GAMR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.