GAMR vs QQQ
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $40M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.31% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.61% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.90% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.11% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GAMR vs QQQ Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +5.61% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, GAMR is up 5.31% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +19.90% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.11% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.66% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.1% for GAMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GAMR and QQQ share 6 holdings out of 117 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or QQQ?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GAMR or QQQ?
Over the past year GAMR returned +5.61% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GAMR annualized +14.66% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GAMR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.1% for GAMR. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GAMR and QQQ?
GAMR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and QQQ?
GAMR and QQQ share 6 common holdings with a 21.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 117 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or QQQ?
GAMR yields 0.50% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GAMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.