GAMR vs VTI
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $40M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.31% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.61% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.90% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.11% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
GAMR vs VTI Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +5.61% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GAMR is up 5.31% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +19.90% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.11% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.66% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GAMR and VTI share 7 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GAMR or VTI?
Over the past year GAMR returned +5.61% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GAMR annualized +14.66% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GAMR and VTI?
GAMR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and VTI?
GAMR and VTI share 7 common holdings with a 13.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or VTI?
GAMR yields 0.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.