GAMR vs IVV
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $40M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.48% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.39% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.20% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.57% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
GAMR vs IVV Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +5.39% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, GAMR is up 8.48% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +20.20% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.57% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +15.01% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GAMR and IVV share 6 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GAMR or IVV?
Over the past year GAMR returned +5.39% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GAMR annualized +15.01% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GAMR and IVV?
GAMR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and IVV?
GAMR and IVV share 6 common holdings with a 16.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR yields 0.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.