GAMR vs IVV
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GAMR or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 48 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.62% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.06% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.98% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.94% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,008 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.2% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.5 years).
GAMR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.5 years both funds cover.
GAMR vs IVV Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +7.06% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, GAMR is up 7.62% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +19.98% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.94% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.83% annualized vs +14.58%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
48.0% of GAMR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GAMR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 48 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 491 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GAMR (82.6% of the fund), and 5 for GAMR that do not appear in IVV (10.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAMR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 10.38% | 7.98% | 2.40% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 12.16% | 5.44% | 6.72% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 9.89% | 1.94% | 7.95% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 9.40% | 1.18% | 8.22% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 3.44% | 0.17% | 3.27% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.76% | 0.06% | 2.70% |
48.0% of GAMR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GAMR or IVV?
Over the past year GAMR returned +7.06% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GAMR annualized +14.83% vs +14.58% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both GAMR and IVV?
GAMR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and IVV?
48.0% of GAMR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.8% of IVV's is in holdings GAMR also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or IVV?
GAMR yields 0.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GAMR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.