GAMR vs VOO
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $40M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.64% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.28% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.04% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.37% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GAMR vs VOO Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +5.28% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, GAMR is up 5.64% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +20.04% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.37% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.69% annualized vs +13.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.50% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GAMR and VOO share 6 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GAMR or VOO?
Over the past year GAMR returned +5.28% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GAMR annualized +14.69% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GAMR and VOO?
GAMR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and VOO?
GAMR and VOO share 6 common holdings with a 15.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR yields 0.50% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.