GAMR vs VOO
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GAMR or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAMR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 48 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.01% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.15% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.30% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,204 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.6% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2016 to Sep 11, 2026 (10.5 years).
GAMR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.5 years both funds cover.
GAMR vs VOO Performance
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GAMR returned +2.74% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, GAMR is up 7.01% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, GAMR compounded at +20.15% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.30% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GAMR has the edge at +14.74% annualized vs +14.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GAMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.2% for GAMR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAMR charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAMR currently yields 0.48% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
47.1% of GAMR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 15.5% of VOO's money is in holdings GAMR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, GAMR as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 48 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GAMR (84.0% of the fund), and 4 for GAMR that do not appear in VOO (8.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAMR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 10.29% | 7.51% | 2.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 12.41% | 4.30% | 8.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 9.62% | 1.92% | 7.70% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 9.20% | 1.47% | 7.73% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 3.11% | 0.21% | 2.90% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.47% | 0.07% | 2.40% |
47.1% of GAMR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GAMR or VOO?
Over the past year GAMR returned +2.74% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GAMR annualized +14.74% vs +14.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GAMR -54.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GAMR and VOO?
GAMR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GAMR and VOO?
47.1% of GAMR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 15.5% of VOO's is in holdings GAMR also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GAMR and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAMR or VOO?
GAMR yields 0.48% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GAMR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GAMR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.