GCSH vs VXUS
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, GCSH or VXUS?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCSH | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $269M | $164.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 694 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | +0.65% | +12.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.40% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% |
| Fund Family | Guggenheim Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GCSH vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GCSH vs VXUS Performance
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF (GCSH) is an ETF from Guggenheim Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GCSH is up 0.65% versus a gain of 12.44% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCSH charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCSH currently yields 0.64% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 145 holdings in GCSH and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 49.2% and 89.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 47 days apart, GCSH as of Sep 16, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 145 positions we hold weights for in GCSH and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 694 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GCSH | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMO:CABank Of Montreal | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCSH and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCSH or VXUS?
GCSH has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCSH or VXUS?
GCSH yields 0.64% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than GCSH?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.