GGME vs VXUS
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $47M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.77% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.37% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.94% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.77% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GGME vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGME returned -1.37% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, GGME is up 5.77% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +23.94% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.77% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, GGME has the edge at +7.23% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $5 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GGME and VXUS share 41 holdings out of 7926 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or VXUS?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGME or VXUS?
Over the past year GGME returned -1.37% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GGME annualized +7.23% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGME or VXUS?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GGME and VXUS?
GGME and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and VXUS?
GGME and VXUS share 41 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7926 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or VXUS?
GGME yields 0.02% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.