GGME vs IVV
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GGME or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GGME led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 109 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.63% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.07% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.36%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.49% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,456 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2005 to Sep 11, 2026 (21.2 years).
GGME vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.2 years both funds cover.
GGME vs IVV Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GGME returned +1.07% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, GGME is up 8.63% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +24.36% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.49% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.54% annualized vs +7.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
44.6% of GGME's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GGME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 505 in IVV, against full books of 109 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 486 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GGME (81.5% of the fund), and 27 for GGME that do not appear in IVV (19.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGME | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.85% | 7.98% | 0.13% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.99% | 6.86% | 1.13% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 8.08% | 1.94% | 6.14% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 7.03% | 0.47% | 6.56% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 4.59% | 0.16% | 4.43% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.27% | 0.25% | 3.02% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 2.85% | 0.08% | 2.77% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.52% | 0.06% | 2.46% |
| TTDTrade Desk, Inc. | 0.46% | 0.01% | 0.45% |
44.6% of GGME is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or IVV?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGME or IVV?
Over the past year GGME returned +1.07% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), GGME annualized +7.34% vs +9.54% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGME or IVV?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GGME and IVV?
GGME and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and IVV?
44.6% of GGME's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 17.8% of IVV's is in holdings GGME also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or IVV?
GGME yields 0.02% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GGME?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GGME led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.