GGME vs VYM
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $47M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.20% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.48% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GGME vs VYM Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGME returned +2.74% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, GGME is up 6.35% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +24.20% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.48% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, GGME has the edge at +7.25% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $4 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or VYM?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGME or VYM?
Over the past year GGME returned +2.74% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), GGME annualized +7.25% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGME or VYM?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GGME and VYM?
GGME and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and VYM?
GGME and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 699 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or VYM?
GGME yields 0.02% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.