GGME vs VOO
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $47M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.74% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.20% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.48% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GGME vs VOO Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGME returned +2.74% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, GGME is up 6.35% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +24.20% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.48% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GGME and VOO share 10 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or VOO?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGME or VOO?
Over the past year GGME returned +2.74% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GGME annualized +7.25% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGME or VOO?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GGME and VOO?
GGME and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and VOO?
GGME and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or VOO?
GGME yields 0.02% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.