GGME vs QQQ
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GGME or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 109 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.57% | +21.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.16% | +25.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.15% | +28.80%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.54% | +15.67%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 18.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,486 | $20,706Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.9% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2005 to Sep 25, 2026 (21.3 years).
GGME vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.3 years both funds cover.
GGME vs QQQ Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GGME returned +4.16% while QQQ returned +25.89%. Year to date, GGME is up 12.57% versus a gain of 21.71% for QQQ.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +28.15% per year against +28.80% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.54% and +15.67% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.29% annualized vs +7.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 18.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $18 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
46.1% of GGME's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings GGME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 109 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GGME (76.1% of the fund), and 26 for GGME that do not appear in QQQ (17.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGME | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.27% | 8.44% | 0.17% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.22% | 7.27% | 0.95% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 7.73% | 2.78% | 4.95% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 7.65% | 1.37% | 6.28% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 5.27% | 0.46% | 4.81% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.63% | 0.73% | 2.90% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 3.10% | 0.22% | 2.88% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.23% | 0.19% | 2.04% |
46.1% of GGME is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or QQQ?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGME or QQQ?
Over the past year GGME returned +4.16% vs +25.89% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), GGME annualized +7.50% vs +15.29% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGME or QQQ?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 18.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both GGME and QQQ?
GGME and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and QQQ?
46.1% of GGME's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.5% of QQQ's is in holdings GGME also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or QQQ?
GGME yields 0.02% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GGME?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.