GGME vs QQQ
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GGME offers more diversification with 109 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $47M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.54% | +15.47% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.10% | +24.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.96% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.20% | +14.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GGME vs QQQ Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GGME returned -0.10% while QQQ returned +24.44%. Year to date, GGME is up 5.54% versus a gain of 15.47% for QQQ.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +23.96% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.20% and +14.22% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs +7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.7% for GGME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $18 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GGME and QQQ share 8 holdings out of 192 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or QQQ?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGME or QQQ?
Over the past year GGME returned -0.10% vs +24.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), GGME annualized +7.21% vs +12.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGME or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.7% for GGME. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GGME and QQQ?
GGME and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and QQQ?
GGME and QQQ share 8 common holdings with a 20.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 192 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or QQQ?
GGME yields 0.02% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.