GGME vs VTI
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GGME or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GGME led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGME | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 109 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +8.63% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.07% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.36%Best | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.49% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,456 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2005 to Sep 11, 2026 (21.2 years).
GGME vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.2 years both funds cover.
GGME vs VTI Performance
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGME returned +1.07% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, GGME is up 8.63% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, GGME compounded at +24.36% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.49% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.52% annualized vs +7.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for GGME and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGME charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGME currently yields 0.02% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 61.9% of GGME's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 109 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGME | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.85% | 6.32% | 1.53% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.99% | 5.84% | 2.15% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 8.08% | 0.00% | 8.08% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 7.03% | 0.41% | 6.62% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 5.28% | 0.11% | 5.17% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 4.59% | 0.11% | 4.48% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.27% | 0.27% | 3.00% |
| EAElectronic Arts, Inc. | 2.93% | 0.07% | 2.86% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 2.85% | 0.06% | 2.79% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.52% | 0.06% | 2.46% |
61.9% of GGME is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGME or VTI?
GGME has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGME or VTI?
Over the past year GGME returned +1.07% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), GGME annualized +7.34% vs +9.52% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGME or VTI?
GGME has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GGME -69.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GGME and VTI?
GGME and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGME and VTI?
At least 61.9% of GGME's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in GGME and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGME or VTI?
GGME yields 0.02% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GGME?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GGME led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.