GGT vs VXUS
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $259M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 24.06% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 226 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.76% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.82% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.84% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.59% | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GGT vs VXUS Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGT returned +19.82% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, GGT is up 10.76% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +6.84% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.59% and +9.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $5 annually, a gap of $165 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.06% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GGT and VXUS share 54 holdings out of 8025 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or VXUS?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $165 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGT or VXUS?
Over the past year GGT returned +19.82% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GGT annualized +0.17% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGT or VXUS?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GGT and VXUS?
GGT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and VXUS?
GGT and VXUS share 54 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8025 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or VXUS?
GGT yields 24.06% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.