GGT vs VYM
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GGT or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $247M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 26.48% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 237 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +1.39% | +11.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.95% | +16.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +18.83%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.51% | +10.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,806 | $16,662Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Nov 6, 2026 (20 years).
GGT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20 years both funds cover.
GGT vs VYM Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGT returned +8.95% while VYM returned +16.77%. Year to date, GGT is up 1.39% versus a gain of 11.84% for VYM.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +10.04% per year against +18.83% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -2.51% and +10.75% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.80% annualized vs -1.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $4 annually, a gap of $166 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 26.48% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 10.5% of VYM's money is in holdings GGT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GGT, our book for it covers 85.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and GGT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, GGT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
14 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 602 in VYM, against full books of 237 and 610.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.27% | 6.94% | 6.67% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 1.32% | 0.77% | 0.55% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 0.99% | 0.38% | 0.61% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.88% | 0.35% | 0.53% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.33% | 0.72% | 0.39% |
| NXSTNexstar Media Group Inc | 1.01% | 0.02% | 0.99% |
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 0.84% | 0.19% | 0.65% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.01% | 0.84% | 0.83% |
| FOXFox Corp. Class B | 0.75% | 0.03% | 0.72% |
| SIRISirius Xm Holdings Inc Common Stock | 0.56% | 0.02% | 0.54% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GGT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or VYM?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $166 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGT or VYM?
Over the past year GGT returned +8.95% vs +16.77% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), GGT annualized -1.51% vs +6.80% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGT or VYM?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GGT and VYM?
GGT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and VYM?
At least 10.5% of VYM's money is in holdings GGT also owns. Our book for GGT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or VYM?
GGT yields 26.48% while VYM yields 2.23%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GGT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.