GGT vs VOO
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $259M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 24.06% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 226 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.03% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.89% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GGT vs VOO Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGT returned +18.69% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, GGT is up 11.03% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +7.03% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.89% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $3 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.06% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GGT and VOO share 35 holdings out of 680 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or VOO?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $167 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGT or VOO?
Over the past year GGT returned +18.69% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GGT annualized +0.18% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGT or VOO?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GGT and VOO?
GGT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and VOO?
GGT and VOO share 35 common holdings with a 13.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 680 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or VOO?
GGT yields 24.06% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.